Today, the media, we learned about breaking social networking "in contact". Read more from Marissa Mayer to gain a more clear picture of the situation. From the comments of Mr. Popkov, the founder and co-owner of similar social networking site Classmates, is breaking occurred on the fault users of social networks "in contact". Let's try to look dispassionately at the situation. Who is to blame, who proshlyapil. According to the statement of Mr. Popkov broke through the fault of users, like how they left their similar to ICQ passwords and hacked their first ICQ, then found out that they are also users of social networks "in contact", and then they create a database of 130 000 people and spread them on the Internet, for Why? To crack ICQ 130 000 users to approximately 100 000 hackers to track each user's point-and ICQ hack it. So Mr.
Popkov's not blaming the rights of users of social networks "in contact" in that they set the same password for all their account. Of course security is much weaker ICQ security social network "in contact", but to get 130 000 and email passwords, no fool, and Hackers fool will not work no point collecting such a database, it is easier to break the site "in contact" rather than break 130 000 000 assemblies, even if just to think logically. Of course, blame the social network "in contact" Mr. Popkov not will – it is stone and in its garden. Now let's see what a social network, first decent fees, I would say very good royalties only from advertising, and classmates to do horror, soon even the input fee will have paid, and then went to the site. With such huge profits gentlemen owners did not think to worry about safety of users, why, when the cereal is dripping, and we have become accustomed to seeing Gorbushka database with pension funds, traffic police and so on. It seems that there is no crime and that replaced the password changed accounts, but no, now go sms-ki, that you are so lucky you Won a tape recorder, throw me to the account of $ 5 and I'll call you now contact information into the hands of fraudsters, spam – it is a trifle, what to do with such data crooks know they will not miss the chance to use them. And then here you can continue to think of anyone interested in this profitable overturn the social network "in contact" is probably another social network, I wonder what?